Those people Research nuclear war to ensure that artificial intelligence will soon power deadly weapons. They aren’t sure what this means.
In mid-July, Nobel Prize winners gathered at the University of Chicago to hear nuclear war experts talk about the end of the world. Within two days, scientists, former government officials and retired military personnel inspired the winners of the most destructive weapon of all time in the closed meeting. The aim is to educate some of the world’s most respected people to learn about one of the most terrifying weapons of all time and to make policy recommendations to world leaders at the end to avoid nuclear war.
Artificial intelligence is in everyone’s mind. “We are entering a new AI and emerging technologies that affect our daily lives, but also the nuclear world we live in,” Stanford professor Scott Sagan said at the end of the negotiations.
It’s a saying, given the necessity of the administration’s mixing AI and nuclear weapons together – everyone I talked to in Chicago believes.
“It’s like electricity,” said Bob Latiff, a retired major general of the U.S. Air Force and a member of the Atomic Scientist Commission’s announcement. “It will find everything.” LATIFF is one of the people who help set the doomsday clock every year.
“The conversation about artificial intelligence and nuclear weapons has been hampered by some major issues. First, no one really knows what AI is,” said Jon Wolfsthal, an expert who is not reinforced, a director of global risk at the American Federation of Scientists and formerly a special assistant to Barack Obama.
“What does it mean to give AI control of nuclear weapons? [computer chip] Control nuclear weapons? “Stanford University professor Herb Lin and the Apocalypse Clock alum.
First, good news. No one thinks Chatgpt or Grok will get nuclear regulations anytime soon. Wolfsthal told me there are many “theological” differences between nuclear experts, but they are united in this regard. “In this field, almost everyone says we want to effectively control nuclear weapons decisions,” he said.
Still, Wolfsthal heard other whispers about LLM’s use at the Center for Power in the United States. “Many people say, ‘Well, look, all I have to do is provide the president with an interactive computer so that he can figure out what Putin or XI would do, and I can produce that dataset very reliably. I can get everything XI or Putin once said and write down anything and statistically states the possibility of any statistical that reflects what Putin said,” he said. ”
