An invisible person asked, “I have a few questions.” Meanwhile, on the screen, an official stood on a podium with a flag on the side. This line (a huge understatement) makes Alex Reynolds and Robert M. Oakshaun (Robert M. What is the following Thousands of Regarding Israel and Palestine, all of this was brought by a voucher reporter at a U.S. State Department press conference.
The piece, collage from official live videos, began on October 3, 2023 as Saudi Arabia is considering normalizing its normal relations with Israel and ending with the sole term of President Biden. The movie stars several tired, tortured journalists, who come day after day, with clumsy eyes just trying to get the answer. This may sound more conceptual than observable, but it’s fascinating, like Christian Marclay’s clock Meet C-Span. It’s like a go out– Monsters are real social forces, in this case the U.S. State Department. The films of Reynolds and Ochshorn are now making their debut in the museum. It will be screened on the Brussels satellite Kanal in Pompidou from September 5 to 6. Previously, it was shown in galleries like et al. In San Francisco, film festivals like other fields in the UK and art fairs such as Arco in Madrid.
The title of this movie is A bunch of questions without answersAnd, it is difficult to get an answer for unnamed journalists attending the briefing. Two State Department spokesmen, Vedant Patel and Matthew Miller, answered questions so high that the artist decided to edit them completely. Cuts sometimes make the spokesperson appear to send out syllable salads, ridicule of the journalist’s invariable “No Chinese Statement”, but the artist is free to get stuck. When journalists ask for clarification, clarification and specific plans, it is not difficult to see why their statements are omitted. These reporters pointed out the contradictions and hypocrisy, and the tension in the room was obvious. “It’s all rhetoric,” one woman replied angrily. You will learn about different journalists: their personalities, methods and hints, if not their beliefs. Despite the scope, each of them became increasingly frustrated over time, and their cool and calm manner gave way to frowning and frustrated sighs.
A straight-faced man in a suit is not a sympathetic character. Sometimes when journalists ask the State Department their own Josh Paul, they are frustrated by it, like Miller. Paul resigned in October 2023, complaining that IDF received preferential treatment in arms sales and that its human rights record could be covered up. “Is he right?” the reporter asked, and Miller smiled, adding to his mean vibe to his chiseled face. Later, the Associated Press reporter (the film’s straightforward shooter) laughed and joked about Israel’s problems of stopping aid in Gaza. The reporter said coldly: “The glitz is a bit inappropriate.”
Alex Reynolds and Robert M. Ochshorn: A bunch of questions without answers2025.
Courteous artist
Many problems will double because trying to get involved in misinformation, reporters ask what they hear or read online is right, just like when reporters try to enter the bottom of the Al-Ahli Hospital bombing that took place on October 17, 2023. The State Council insists on firmly and firmly in Israel’s innocence. Here, “How do you know?” becomes a common problem, with many other reports being different from the State Council’s conclusions. A clear pattern has since emerged: Less than half of the hospitals in Gaza are operating, and Israel has bombed another this week, killing at least 20 people, including four Palestinian journalists.
As the film progresses, journalists’ distrust grows, and their problems become more useful without satisfactory information. “Do you have any way to track the number of Palestinians?” asked a man in mid-November. There are also many major problems – the indirect problem itself is not the pursuit of facts, but as a way to urge accountability and transparency. On October 10, a reporter asked: “Will you admit that Palestinian children have been killed?” By October 23, after more than 50% of the houses in Gaza were destroyed, another asked: “Are there any plans?”
The reporter also tried to get the spokesperson to admit his hypocrisy: “You have said in the past that it is never right to hit the hospital,” “Will you say that in this case?” The matter is still factual and specific, but still pointed out.
Art is always energetic out of atrocities. How do you recruit art meaningfully when the stakes are so high – such an incompetent and indifferent person? Again, how do you divert your attention anywhere else? Reynolds and Ochshorn skipped the serious but doomed effort to gather bass suspension fruits like Trump and Netanyahu, instead choosing to unite with the savior complex, training our focus on the American Democratic Party and bureaucracy rather than images of the murdered and hungry Gaza people. This choice has many implications – reminding the United States to be responsible for funding and supplying weapons for genocide, the Democratic non-action, lies and hypocrisy help elect Trump. But these are just the meanings. The original shot talks to himself.
The film will end on January 15, 2025, the last day Miller is working. A ceasefire agreement has just been reached. The agreement will not last, but journalists don’t know, although some doubt it. The reporter asked if Trump deserves more honors than Biden and if the State Department feels regretful. Another woman asked whether the United States would count on its role in funding war crimes when the dust settled, which was shocking in its possibility. After all, the State Council has done a great job in the atrocities of name change. This is the art of PR.
