What are the new features of Cloud 4? And why it became my favorite AI tool

Chatgpt is by far the most famous AI chat service, but that doesn’t automatically make it the best. Google Gemini has always been ranked No. 1 on the rankings and is not counted as Claude.

If you are not familiar with Claude, it is the large family of language models made by AI companies humans. Claude has just made a huge upgrade in the form of human’s latest AI model, Claude 4. Technically, Claude 4 is two models: Claude Ops 4 and Claude’s sonnet 4.

These new models bring a lot of desktops in terms of AI capabilities, including improved reasoning and coding, comparable to anything Chatgpt-Maker Openai made. This is new to Claude 4, and all the reasons you might consider using Claude instead of Chatgpt.

Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4

Claude 4 is not actually a large language model – it is family Large language model. Currently, there are two models in this family – Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4, both of which I have used. Hawkeye AI users may be wondering if I have the correct naming, but indeed, humans have switched from “Claude 3.7 sonnet” to “Claude Sonnet 4”. I prefer the new naming, but of course the conversion of the naming convention is a bit confusing.

So, what is the difference between Claude Sonnet 4 and Claude Opus 4? In short, Claude Sonnet 4 is the everyday model you will use to ask basic questions, find information, and more. Claude Opus 4, on the other hand, is useful for advanced coding.

According to anthropomorphism, both Claude 4 models are better than their predecessors in important ways. For beginners, the company says the likelihood of taking shortcuts in certain agent workflows that may be vulnerable to shortcuts and vulnerabilities is reduced by 65%. Not only that, Claude Opus 4 also has greatly improved memory capabilities, allowing it to better remember information in the development workflow. For example, it can create memory files for reference without the need for a larger context window (the amount of basic data the model can process at once).

The more advanced Claude Opus 4 is a trade-off. Given that it is a larger model, it is much more expensive to use and therefore is unavailable to free users. Even those who pay a $20 monthly subscription to Claude Pro after using Claude Opus 4 may be subject to restrictions. However, those who subscribe to the highest account of $100 per month will receive higher limits.

Why I like Claude

I really like Claude, although it’s important to note that there are still many features that won’t be available in Claude and another AI service. The biggest thing I like about Claude is that it feels more like…human feelings.

That said, everything from design to the responses I get is more personal and natural. This is true for both the Claude Sonnet 4 and the Claude Opus 4. Like the Little “Thinking” icon, there are some more important differences, such as the type of text it produces. Some of this is related to the fact that you can use presets and custom “styles” to customize each chat, which determines how Cloud responds. Preset options include “Simple” and “Explanatory”, but you can also create your own styles.

Claude and the game

As AI services continue to improve at an astonishing pace, not all AI services offer all capabilities. That said, Claude does not have many features yet yes For example, available in chatgpt.

For example, Claude cannot generate images, and everyone has just begun to launch voice chat services within Claude. Still in Beta, Claude’s voice chat doesn’t sound as natural as the text-based version. These may be your table cakes – if you rely heavily on these features, then Cloud may not be the only AI service you need, or may not be the only AI service you need.

But Claude got it too a lot of Correct. For example, Claude has a “deep research” type feature (referred to as research) that parses through many sources to find information. It also has the “extended thinking” function, which is essentially a reasoning function that will think through its answers for longer time before answering, thus making the overall answer more accurate.

Although Claude has gotten better at tasks like research and simple daily use, its best use cases are still coding. To be clear, I’m just a basic encoder, but in all respects, Claude is better than any other service in coding. Claude’s manufacturer Anthropic has even created a standalone service called Claude Code, a specially built coding assistant powered by Claude Opus 4.

The good news is that you don’t have to pay to try Claude, although you won’t be able to use its state-of-the-art features if you don’t. Instead, all you need to do is create an account and give it a try, which you can do before you pay to see the service and whether it is right for you.

Disclosure: Mashable’s parent company Ziff Davis filed a lawsuit against Openai in April, accusing it of infringing on Ziff Davis’ copyright in training and operating its AI systems.